Top News, Articles, and Interviews in Philosophy

A Defence of Sexual Inclusion (Preprint)

Philosophy News image
Random and unrelated imageI'm almost reluctant to share this. I have a new paper coming out in the journal Social Theory and Practice later this year. The paper looks at whether we, as a society, should care about the problem of sexual inclusion and whether, if we do, this means that we should recognise the existence of rights to sexual inclusion. I argue, tentatively, that we should care about it and that it is not absurd to suppose that this supports such rights.Although I think the position I defend in the paper is fairly modest, and, I hope, sensible, I'm conscious of the fact that some people are going to think it is ridiculous or controversial or dangerous because it engages with some tricky aspects of social justice (feminism, misogyny, disability rights theory etc). Given this, I hope that people read the full paper and engage with the arguments offered therein; I hope that people don't comment on or dismiss it on the basis of what they think it says based on the abstract or some third party summary.I would also add, for what it is worth, that this paper was blind reviewed by two people. The first reviewer commented very favourably on the paper (probably the most positive comments I have received from a peer reviewer) but did note that the subject matter may prove controversial. The second reviewer was less favourable (though still recommended publication) but observed that the paper was much less controversial than I seemed to think. In fact, they suggested that the paper be revised to downplay its controversial nature.So I'm not sure what to think about it as a result. Is it controversial and/or sensible? Or neither? Or what?Title: A Defence of Sexual InclusionJournal: Social Theory and PracticeLinks: Official (not yet); Philpapers; Researchgate; Academia Abstract: This article argues that access to meaningful sexual experience should be included within the set of the goods that are subject to principles of distributive justice. It argues that some. . .

Continue reading . . .

News source: Philosophical Disquisitions

blog comments powered by Disqus