Top News, Articles, and Interviews in Philosophy

Trump & Lynching

Philosophy News image
Image Credit Trump recently tweeted a comparison between his impeachment process and lynching. Since “lynching” carries a bloody and brutal historical burden in the United States, this ignited the usual firestorm. Critics of the president chastised him for using the term, some Republicans expressed mild dismay at his word choice and others insisted that the president was spot on in his comparison. In addition to the specific matter of Trump’s use of the term, there is also the broader issue of the use of such terms in political discourse. Trump could certainly be defended by asserting that he is ignorant of the connection of the term to racial violence in the United States and was simply using the term in utter innocence. Given the level of cognitive capacity Trump exhibits in his rambling, nonsensical speeches and his difficulty with language, it would be reasonable to accept that Trump really had no idea of the significance of the term. As such, the ignorance defense would be a plausible move. Trump could also be defended by contending that he is not ignorant, but that he was merely using the term in a commonly used way. After all, one might argue, people do refer to metaphorical “lynch mobs” being after them or someone else. On this defense, the critics are reading too much into “lynching. Trump was simply using it the same way he uses phrases like “witch hunt”—a hyperbolic expression of his rage at others following due process to address his high crimes and misdemeanors.   Trump is obviously using the term incorrectly—lynching involves a parody of justice: mob violence inflicted without a trial. While one might disagree with the Democrats, they are operating well within the framework of the Constitution and in accord with the established processes for impeachment. One could argue that the whole point of hyperbole is to exaggerate—which is true. But to defend Trump’s use of the term by asserting he is right would be an error.  The rage is,. . .

Continue reading . . .

News source: A Philosopher's Blog

blog comments powered by Disqus