Locke's Philosophy of Science

[Revised entry by Hylarie Kochiras on September 25, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html] Locke has been widely hailed for providing an epistemological foundation for the
Philosophy News image
[Revised entry by Hylarie Kochiras on September 25, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html] Locke has been widely hailed for providing an epistemological foundation for the experimental science of his day, articulating the new, probabilistic form of knowledge appropriate to it. But while he is in important respects a devotee of that new science, there are also significant tensions in his thought. He stands behind its experimental methods as he targets the earlier, speculative or rationalist philosophies, for methodologies and epistemological expectations unsuited to natural philosophy. He also frequently appears to embrace the new science’s corpuscular hypothesis, whose powers and minute particles figure prominently in his attempt to understand why we cannot hope for demonstrative certainty about natural phenomena. Yet the new science’s methodology was evolving. Just how far did Locke travel with that evolution, and what aspects of his thought prevented him from going. . .

Continue reading . . .

News source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

blog comments powered by Disqus