Jonathan Meades. It is a cult of "puritanical, po-faced, censorious nothingness"" href="/post/2017/10/20/The-fate-of-artists-and-of-art-itself-is-in-the-hands-of-too-few-persons-who-share-kindred-tastes-and-cultish-dogma-says-lt;stronggt;Jonathan-Meadeslt;stronggt;-It-is-a-cult-of-puritanical-po-faced-censorious-nothingness.aspx" />

Self-Deception

[Revised entry by Ian Deweese-Boyd on November 7, 2016. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Virtually every aspect of self-deception, including its definition and paradigmatic cases, is a matter
Philosophy News image
[Revised entry by Ian Deweese-Boyd on November 7, 2016. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Virtually every aspect of self-deception, including its definition and paradigmatic cases, is a matter of controversy among philosophers. Minimally, self-deception involves a person who seems to acquire and maintain some false belief in the teeth of evidence to the contrary as a consequence of some motivation, and who may display behavior suggesting some awareness of the truth. Beyond this, philosophers divide over whether self-deception is intentional, involves belief or some other sub-or-non-doxastic attitude, whether self-deceivers are...

Continue reading . . .

News source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

blog comments powered by Disqus