CIS Overconfidence

Embed from Getty Images Television shows and movies about CIS often seem to present a science fiction version of investigation that involves amazing technology and incredible inferences. While
Philosophy News image
Embed from Getty Images Television shows and movies about CIS often seem to present a science fiction version of investigation that involves amazing technology and incredible inferences. While people do get that the almost magical solving of crimes is fiction, there is still considerable overconfidence in many methods used in real investigations. This overconfidence plays a significant role in some of the problems infecting the criminal justice system. The history of criminal investigation is replete with debunked methods, such as the use of phrenology to diagnose criminal tendencies. There are also technologies that have little or no validity and are not admitted in court, yet enjoy some public confidence (such as lie detectors). There are also methods that might have some value in investigations, yet are the subject of unwarranted overconfidence in their efficacy. These include such things as bite mark analysis and fiber analysis. Other methods are reasonable useful, such as. . .

Continue reading . . .

News source: Talking Philosophy

blog comments powered by Disqus