<strong>How to think about anger</strong>. Its arguments are weak and pathetic, says Martha Nussbaum, while the voice of generosity is strong as well as beautiful&nbsp;

How to think about anger. Its arguments are weak and pathetic, says Martha Nussbaum, while the voice of generosity is strong as well as
Philosophy News image
How to think about anger. Its arguments are weak and pathetic, says Martha Nussbaum, while the voice of generosity is strong as well as beautiful 

Continue reading . . .

News source: Arts & Letters Daily

blog comments powered by Disqus