Top News, Articles, and Interviews in Philosophy

Attempts to justify the humanities tend to be a self-congratulatory fantasy: I read better books so I’m a better person. Stanley Fish has read the best books. He's not a better person

Philosophy News image
Attempts to justify the humanities tend to be a self-congratulatory fantasy: I read better books so I’m a better person. Stanley Fish has read the best books. He's not a better person

Continue reading . . .

News source: Arts & Letters Daily

How did Germans see Nazism? Not as we see it. Habituation, confusion, distraction, self-interest, fear, rationalization, and a sense of personal powerlessness made terrible things possible

Philosophy News image
How did Germans see Nazism? Not as we see it. Habituation, confusion, distraction, self-interest, fear, rationalization, and a sense of personal powerlessness made terrible things possible

Continue reading . . .

News source: Arts & Letters Daily

The Stanford prison experiment enjoys canonical status as evidence of our innate cruelty and inhumanity. Yet the study almost certaintly has no scientific validity. Why does it endure?

Philosophy News image
The Stanford prison experiment enjoys canonical status as evidence of our innate cruelty and inhumanity. Yet the study almost certaintly has no scientific validity. Why does it endure?

Continue reading . . .

News source: Arts & Letters Daily

Genuine Pretending: On the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi

Philosophy News image
2018.06.18 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Hans-Georg Moeller and Paul J. D'Ambrosio, Genuine Pretending: On the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi, Columbia University Press, 2017, 221 pp., $35.00, ISBN 9780231183994. Reviewed by Susan Blake, Bard College "A romp through 'the vast wilds of open nowhere'" -- Roger Ebert "Better than any existing work on humor" -- Aristotle "Nothing more than a success" -- Guy Smiley "A demonstration of nothing . . . in a technical sense" -- Ford Prefect "A tour de force through the 'homeland of non-even-anything'" -- Steven Colbert This book presents a novel reading of the Zhuangzi that illuminates its humor and presents it as responding to philosophical concerns of its day. To the extent that these philosophical concerns are also those of the present day -- the search for a sane and healthy response to the impossible demands of sincerity -- we can, through... Read More

Continue reading . . .

News source: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // News

Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics

Philosophy News image
2018.06.17 : View this Review Online | View Recent NDPR Reviews Tyron Goldschmidt and Kenneth L. Pearce (ed.), Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, 2017, 336 pp., $60.00, ISBN 9780198746973. Reviewed by Adam P. Taylor, North Dakota State University The familiar narrative about the early days of analytic philosophy tells us of its triumph over the needless metaphysical excesses of its immediate forerunners, the idealists. In one form or another, idealism was the paramount philosophical view of the 19th century. Nowadays, however, the bulwarks of idealism are largely abandoned. Few defend the view, and fewer still are willing to take the time to consider its claims seriously. Materialism and dualism dominate the philosophical landscape. The essays offered in this volume are, the editors tell us, intended to "correct the unjustified neglect of idealism by presenting a variety of arguments for and against various versions of idealism" (p. ix). In. . .

Continue reading . . .

News source: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // News

Revitalizing the Epistemology of Religion

Philosophy News image
Philosophers studying epistemology debate the exact nature of knowledge, typically by examining the “evidence” behind one’s beliefs: logical processes, sensory perception, and so on. They also wonder about how much we can know. Knowledge about the empirical world is perhaps one thing; yet what about our beliefs in the areas of history, or mathematics, or morality, or politics? Or religion? Religious belief is subject to constant scrutiny in both philosophy and some popular culture. Should people believe that there is a God or deity of some kind–what kind of evidence or grounds might there be either for or against its, or their, existence? Matters of religion can seem to mimic morality or politics in at least these ways: it can be rather unclear what counts as the right sort of evidence for believing one way or another on some question. And the social nature of our coming to believe (or disbelieve) anything about these domains means that we are largely dependent on testimony from. . .

Continue reading . . .

News source: OUPblog » Philosophy

Latest News


Here are some of the things going on in philosophy
and the humanities.

See all News Items

Philosopher Spotlight


Conversations with philosophers, professional and non-professional alike.
Visit our podcast section for more interviews and conversations.

Interview with

Dr. Robert McKim
  • on Religious Diversity
  • Professor of Religion and Professor of Philosophy
  • Focuses on Philosophy of Religion
  • Ph.D. Yale

Interview with

Dr. Alvin Plantinga
  • on Where the Conflict Really Lies
  • Emeritus Professor of Philosophy (UND)
  • Focuses on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Religion
  • Ph.D. Yale

Interview with

Dr. Peter Boghossian
  • on faith as a cognitive sickness
  • Teaches Philosophy at Portland State University (Oregon)
  • Focuses on atheism and critical thinking
  • Has a passion for teaching in prisons
See all interviews

30500

Twitter followers

10000+

News items posted

32000+

Page views per month

21 years

in publication

Latest Articles


\
See all Articles

Recent Books in Philosophy


Check out some of the latest books being published in philosophy
in various fields and disciplines.